kaal:claim:5541658-012

Post hoc explainability techniques do not by themselves establish trustworthiness; the explanations they produce must additionally be verified against human knowledge.

Source quote, verbatim

However, post-hoc explainers still need to be verified for trustworthiness, in that the explanations comport with human knowledge.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), C. Explainability and Trustworthiness, p. 20
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

post hoc explainable AI methods such as the SHAP family of explainers

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: unverified post hoc explanationsfamily: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gapai-and-agentsreputation

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/72965bbdd98fc6f3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-012.md | sha256sum