kaal:claim:5554218-012

The authors contest the prevailing scholarly proposition that harmonized conflict of laws principles are necessary to govern digital assets across common and civil law jurisdictions, arguing that this proposition misconstrues the foundational ethos of blockchain technology.

Source quote, verbatim
The proposition that harmonized conflict of laws principles are necessary to govern digital assets across common law and civil law jurisdictions, as advocated by scholars like Aleinieh, Zoboli, Atiyah, and Kasatkina, misconstrues the foundational ethos of blockchain technology
From

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025), 2.3.3 Preserving Decentralized Innovation in Digital Asset Governance, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218 · source PDF

Cite as

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Harmonization misconstrues blockchain ethosfamily: harmonization-and-standardization-failuredecentralizationblockchain

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/be25c83d7315f966...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-012.md | sha256sum