kaal:claim:5554218-016

Neither online dispute resolution nor decentralized dispute resolution complies with the minimum due process requirements defined and acknowledged in the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which is ratified and enforced in 172 states.

Source quote, verbatim
It is important to note that neither ODR nor DDR comply with the minimal requirements of due process as defined and acknowledged in the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,47 which is ratified and enforced in 172 States.
From

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025), 2.6 Dispute Resolution Involving Real World Assets (RWA) Tokenized Through Smart Contracts, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218 · source PDF

Cite as

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: assertedfailure: ODR and DDR fail New York Convention due processfamily: enforcement-gapinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/10f106e7966960d3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-016.md | sha256sum