kaal:claim:5554218-036

Allowing jurisdictions to tailor smart contract requirements to local statutory frameworks while adhering to a baseline of ethical principles preserves the innovative potential of blockchain by avoiding the homogenizing effects of harmonized legal standards.

Source quote, verbatim
This flexibility preserves the innovative potential of blockchain by avoiding the homogenizing effects of harmonized legal standards, which could stifle jurisdictional experimentation.
From

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025), 6.4 Mitigating Conflict of Laws and Jurisdictional Challenges, p. 36
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218 · source PDF

Cite as

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

Holds when
Classification

designsupport: arguedlaw-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designinnovation

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a44dbcded7ab094a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-036.md | sha256sum