kaal:claim:5887242-023

In the worked numerical example, a single incorrect high-conviction bet costs the dissenting expert seventy five percent of his governance influence, demonstrating the severity of tight coupling.

Source quote, verbatim

David loses 75% of his influence in a single incorrect high-conviction bet

From

Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025), Chapter III.B.7, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242

Holds when

the stipulated five-expert numerical scenario in the article

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 4e5c2e2b4304af6d22e0b0939b1fddeabcf091e19a1b00b7bfccf77cbd6280c5. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/cafbca4b4482cd53...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-023.md | sha256sum