kaal:claim:617681-040
One objection to arbitration of corporate governance disputes holds in Europe as in the United States: arbitration as ordinarily used yields little relevant precedent.
Source quote, verbatim
Coffee has one objection to arbitration of corporate governance disputes that is as persuasive in Europe as in the United States. Arbitration, as it is used in most contexts, yields little relevant precedent.
From
Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004), E.III.2 Arbitration as a Viable Alternative in Europe, p. 48
https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681 · source PDF
Cite as
Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681
Holds when
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: precedent-deficit-in-arbitrationfamily: enforcement-gaplaw-and-legal-systems
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e142130507ea2f5b025fd97b3f762d44ee3a7aaa82b155aab63434b85e8fd834. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/230774e562915125...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/617681-040.md | sha256sum