Binary upvote and downvote validation destroys roughly ninety seven percent of the available quality signal produced by validator assessments.
Source quote, verbatim
We're destroying 97% of the available quality signal.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026), III.C. Binary Information Destruction, p. 23 https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998
Holds when
five validators supplying two dimensional assessments on ten point scales
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/63f327a8d4a6f2b1...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-021.md | sha256sum