kaal:claim:6269518-040

Because the analysis rests on the Nash equilibrium concept, it does not rule out coordinated under-citation among colluding groups; coalition-proof equilibrium analysis is needed to address that possibility.

Source quote, verbatim

Fourth, the analysis has focused on the Nash equilibrium concept. Coalition-proof equilibrium analysis would address the possibility of coordinated under-citation among groups of colluding agents.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026), VI.C. Limitations and Future Work, p. 17
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518

Holds when

groups of agents able to coordinate citation strategies

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: collusive under-citation unaddressedfamily: research-design-limitationeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is f096ecf5b41bb9ae8642facd54b9149c7b594de53a1cc32718a4d806b772f88f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/383c536202bbcd3b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6269518-040.md | sha256sum