kaal:claim:6607458-036

In the computative commons the governance task inverts: because realization-level output is non-rival while generative capacity is rival, governance must prevent generation-level degradation of the generative substrate rather than consumption-level exhaustion of a pool.

Source quote, verbatim
but the generative-capacity pool is rival, and overuse of computational resources, degradation of training data through adversarial manipulation, or capture of model architectures by concentrated interests can exhaust the generative substrate on which the commons depends.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026), IX.D. Commons Governance under Generated Outputs, p. 26
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458

Holds when
Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: Generative Substrate Exhaustionfamily: environmental-and-resource-costgovernance-designinstitutional-design

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/3e8525bb15a52761...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-036.md | sha256sum