kaal:claim:6655138-020

Cross-surface reflection proposals must be advisory rather than binding, because the target agent's objective component is private and a reallocation that would raise reputation accrual may still be misaligned with that objective; coercive reallocation would violate the autonomy of the objective, which the architecture preserves.

First, Σ_R proposals are advisory rather than binding: the target agent's compute allocation cannot be coerced by a confirmed reallocation proposal, since the agent's O component is private and the reallocation might be misaligned with the agent's objective

Wulf A. Kaal, Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems (2026), VI.F The cross-surface reflection surface, p. 17
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6655138 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Possibility Loops An Operational Architecture for Computative Economics in Agent Coordination Systems (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6655138

• the cross-surface reflection surface only

designsupport: arguedai-and-agents

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 52cb210167f06f0c7a2581214b156326216543de80b8394320b629c045c9e214. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/cc2083dfd5e22a8f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6655138-020.md | sha256sum