kaal:claim:7456999-061

The record's measured advantage over passing visible checks changes sign under an arbitrary file-order tie-break, so the quantity is not resolved at this sample size.

That comparison is also unstable in a way the interval already implies. Selecting the first satisfying artifact in file order, an arbitrary choice, reverses the sign and the record loses by 0.0511. Averaging over which satisfying artifact is chosen, which is the honest treatment because file order carries no meaning, the record wins by 0.0374. A quantity that changes sign under a tie-break has not been measured at this sample size.

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026), V.A.4 What the cohort does not show, stated at the same volume, p. 23
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999

• the comparison between highest-record and passes-the-checked-cases selectors

failuresupport: evidencedempirical-evidenceresearch-methodsai-and-agents

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 01016fbbcc25cad205cebd59ea686d8dfee8ae9b632095d86ba6c9a900456a4b.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7456999-061.md | sha256sum