kaal:claim:7456999-074

Experiment T did not show that consensus-weighted selection outperformed equal weighting because the +0.0017 difference had a ninety-five percent interval from -0.0051 to +0.0085.

Source quote, verbatim

Experiment T does not show that consensus-weighted selection outperformed equal-weighted selection within this panel and task. Across 589 surviving prompts, joint satisfaction was 0.7963 under consensus weighting and 0.7946 under equal weighting, a difference of +0.0017 with a 95% interval from -0.0051 to +0.0085.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026), VIII. Limitations and Future Work, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Reinforcement Learning from Reputation Feedback (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7456999

Holds when

Experiment T's seven-model panel and two-constraint task

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedempirical-evidenceresearch-methodsai-and-agents

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 01016fbbcc25cad205cebd59ea686d8dfee8ae9b632095d86ba6c9a900456a4b.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7456999-074.md | sha256sum