kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-017

Despite the limits of the comparison, had In re Citigroup and Disney been decided in Germany the allocation of liability would have been different, because German courts are generally more willing than Delaware courts to second-guess directors' decisions.

it seems difficult to escape the conclusion that had the two American cases, In re Citigroup and Disney, been decided in Germany, the liability allocation would have been different. German courts generally seem more willing to second-guess directors' decisions than Delaware courts.

Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013), A Comparative Perspective on the Duty to Monitor, p. 7
· source PDF

Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

• cases involving extreme facts at the cusp of culpable conduct

empiricalsupport: arguedcorporate-governancelaw-and-legal-systems

• specializes kaal:claim:1558614-006 Although the business judgment rule is articulated differently in the two countries and German law leaves some...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/14fd1fd8299ccfe5...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-017.md | sha256sum