kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-024

The author endorses the conclusion that attempts to enhance oversight in the United States may fail and that emphasizing improved oversight as a means of enhancing corporate governance could be ill-advised.

Source quote, verbatim

This weighs in favour of Professor Fairfax's conclusion that attempts to enhance oversight in the United States may fail and an emphasis on emphasizing improving oversight as a means of enhancing corporate governance could be ill-advised.

From

Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013), A Comparative Perspective on the Duty to Monitor, p. 8
· source PDF

Cite as

Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

Holds when

United States corporate governance

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: failure of oversight enhancement as a governance strategyfamily: board-and-oversight-failurecorporate-governancegovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c1dcff57d192e671...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-024.md | sha256sum