entity · derived
Design
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying design. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3405401-034 : The required review of counterparty history is possible through a platform that creates reputation for both parties and for the smart contract itself, so reputation must attach to code as well as to p
- 3782191-018 : Future decentralized infrastructure products, such as a decentralized verification engine, need to be built to address the inaccuracy of randomly generated information in decentralized systems.
- 3782201-019 : The correct goal is not to eliminate the middlemen but to automate them, because unlike human middlemen automated middlemen can be designed so that they do not contribute to the corruption they were b
- 5454054-002 : LER should be built as a bifurcated architecture: voucher-based rewards for equities held in brokerage accounts, and programmable on-chain reward units for tokenized equities.
- 5454054-023 : LER can be engineered outside the Howey test by keeping reward units consumptive as discounts or credits, non-yielding, unmarketed for appreciation, and by disabling secondary trading.
- 7596939-010 : The non-assignability of future salary is an explicit design assumption of this Article rather than a consequence of proportional distribution, and the Article says so.
- 7596939-023 : The experiment was pre-registered and time-stamped before any registered episode ran, with design, prompts and analysis code frozen in advance.
- 7598518-003 : The test was designed, preregistered, and frozen before any result was read.
- 7598518-004 : Model engines served as blind auditors of the design, the code and the text, and they are not independent peer review.
- 7598518-006 : Because the Gaussian outcomes already exist, written before any venue reviewed the design, the paper does not claim untouched Stage 1 status.
- 7598518-008 : The design fixes, before any data, the sentences the paper may write for each outcome and the conditions for each, and it bars claims about staking incentives, slashing, collusion, Sybil resistance, d
- 7598518-011 : The analysis refuses to unseal unless the design hash is accepted, the tree is clean and matches its commit byte for byte, and the code differs from the audited commits only in a named allowlist.
- 7598518-024 : No validator, filter, or score in the design is asked about rarity, novelty, frequency, diversity, or coverage, and the outcome is computed by an evaluator alone from a sealed reference that no filter
- 7598518-036 : The design binds in one file, frozen by hash only after twenty-two rounds of blind audit by two model engines, and every harness and analysis step refuses to run against a design whose hash differs.
- 7598518-039 : Because no standard deviation was known before the runs, the design fixes a masked release in which the analysis releases only each test's variance of paired differences, withholds the mean, and repor
- 7598518-042 : The design names a failure pattern in advance: if the likelihood filter, the equal-weight pool, and the reputation pool each carry the negative label against full replacement in every family, the pape