entity · derived
Disruptive innovation
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying disruptive-innovation. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2740477-001 : Ex post trial and error rulemaking built on stable and presumptively optimal rules produces suboptimal regulatory outcomes that are no longer sustainable once disruptive innovation grows exponentially
- 2740477-003 : Exponential disruptive innovation has the potential to overwhelm the existing regulatory process outright, not merely to strain it.
- 2740477-008 : Disruptive innovative technology frequently does not fit the legal categories created by recalcitrant regulatory structures, so the classification problem itself is a source of regulatory failure.
- 2740477-009 : When disruptive firms do not comply with existing rules or write their own exemptions because no appropriate rules exist, consumer protection and public safety goals are undermined and incumbent firms
- 2740477-010 : Incumbent firms facing the competitive disadvantage created by disruptive entrants respond by using the existing regulatory process itself to build obstacles to competition, which converts rulemaking
- 2740477-011 : The rising complexity of innovation driven regulatory issues confuses political and policy makers about rapidly emerging disruptive change, which makes a coherent political and policy solution to thos
- 2740477-013 : Technological transition will be a permanent state in the age of disruptive innovation, so the uncertainty and inconsistency caused by rulemakers' inability to react in time is a standing condition ra
- 2740477-019 : Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two sided risk: regulate too early and innovation is inhibited, withhold regulation too long and consumers and markets are harmed once regulatory ine
- 2740477-021 : New regulations aimed at an innovative product can be obsolete before they are finalized.
- 2808132-001 : Regulation is usually reactive because it responds to facts, but the current environment is one of data rather than settled facts; regulation must therefore become proactive and dynamically responsive
- 2808132-002 : Ex post facts-based, trial-and-error rulemaking combined with stable and presumptively optimal rules often produces suboptimal regulatory outcomes, and those outcomes are no longer sustainable in an e
- 2808132-003 : In an environment of exponential disruptive innovation, the information rulemakers need is less likely to materialize soon enough for traditional rulemaking to be effective, regulatory issues become m
- 2808132-004 : Exponential disruptive innovation has the potential to overwhelm the existing regulatory process entirely, not merely to strain it.
- 2808132-007 : A market leader's failure to invest in disruptive technologies often results in an abrupt loss of market dominance and frequently in total replacement in that market.
- 2808132-008 : Market leaders, successful institutions, and managers fail specifically when they do not distinguish sustaining technologies from disruptive technologies.
- 2808132-011 : Incumbent firms facing a perceived threat from disruptive innovation may respond by using the existing regulatory process itself to create obstacles that prevent disruptive firms from competing.
- 2808132-012 : The political system is less likely to be able to resolve the challenges of disruptive innovation because the increasing complexity of innovation-driven regulatory issues causes confusion among politi
- 2808132-013 : The existing regulatory infrastructure cannot sufficiently distinguish beneficial innovation from harmful innovation and therefore cannot harness the beneficial kind.
- 2808132-023 : Because formal rulemaking takes months and often years, regulators are still processing the previous product launch while new products reach the market, and new regulations pertaining to an innovative
- 2831040-010 : An existing regulatory infrastructure built on stable and presumptively optimal rules is largely incapable of addressing the ever increasing unknown future contingencies associated with disruptive inn
- 2831040-013 : The faster the cycle of disruptive innovation, the shorter the timeline for society to adapt and respond with a familiar pattern of laws, regulation, and frameworks, which gives disruptive exponential
- 2834531-005 : The time frame for rulemaking in the existing regulatory infrastructure is largely inadequate to address the regulatory challenges created by disruptive innovation.
- 2834531-007 : New regulations addressed to an innovative product can be obsolete before they are even finalized.
- 2834531-017 : Faced with disruptive innovation, regulators believe their only options are reckless action, meaning regulation without sufficient facts, or paralysis, meaning doing nothing; in that bind caution beat
- 2939127-001 : The core lawyer characteristics and skillsets produced by the existing legal education and regulatory framework are incompatible with what the practice of law in the 21st century demands.
- 2939127-002 : Disruptive innovation in law renders obsolete many and probably most of the traditional legal skills and characteristics that law schools currently cultivate.
- 2939127-033 : Exponentially increasing disruptive innovation will lead clients to routinely bring legal professionals problems that those lawyers cannot fully understand, inside a legal framework that does not alwa
- 2957645-002 : Facts-based, ex-post, trial-and-error rulemaking cannot anticipate the regulatory issues created by innovation, so rulemakers may not realize, or may realize far too late, what new regulatory demands
- 2957645-003 : Formal rulemaking in the existing regulatory infrastructure is too time consuming, and the speed of product innovation frequently renders regulations pertaining to an innovative product obsolete befor
- 2957645-004 : The existing regulatory infrastructure, resting on stable and presumptively optimal rules, is largely incapable of addressing the unknown future contingencies associated with disruptive innovation.
- 2957645-006 : The issuance of contingent capital securities is a promising dynamic regulatory mechanism that can help address the suboptimal regulatory outcomes associated with disruptive innovation.
- 3411897-010 : Market leaders, successful institutions, and managers fail specifically when they do not distinguish sustaining technologies from disruptive technologies.
- 3411897-011 : A market leader's lack of investment in disruptive technologies often causes abrupt loss of market dominance and even total replacement, because market leaders shortsightedly refuse to cannibalize the
- 3411897-012 : Nokia, Kodak, and Blackberry all collapsed after fast changes in their markets rendered their products and services irrelevant, illustrating that successful companies drift into obscurity when they fa
- 3808859-002 : Market leaders fail against disruptive technologies because they shortsightedly refuse to cannibalize their own dominant position, and that refusal often produces abrupt loss of market dominance or to