entity · derived
Sifi designation
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying sifi-designation. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2470008-011 : International regulators agree on designation criteria but not on the unit of assessment: the FSB and IOSCO assess systemic importance at the fund level while the OFR would assess it at the asset mana
- 2470008-016 : The quantitative measures used in systemic risk assessment are not codified in statute, so the FSOC can alter its thresholds and its analysis through rulemaking.
- 2470008-017 : Commonly managed investment funds holding $50 billion or more in aggregate total consolidated assets can be designated systemically important, and following a similar investment strategy across those
- 2470008-018 : Stage one of the FSOC's designation process is a mechanical screen: six quantitative thresholds filter out nonbank financial institutions unlikely to pose significant systemic risk before any institut
- 2470008-019 : SIFI designation changes the nature of regulation for a nonbank financial institution, subjecting it to substantial additional regulation and forcing it to change how it does business, which can in tu
- 2470008-020 : The FSOC's three stage SIFI review process depends heavily on information that private fund investment advisers supply through Form PF.
- 2470008-034 : Because the FSOC uses RAUM related valuations directly and indirectly to set stage one thresholds, and because RAUM requires substantial filer interpretation, it is questionable whether the FSOC can u
- 2748096-027 : The FSOC's powers over hedge funds and other nonbank financial institutions are broad and unprecedented in U.S. financial regulation, including the power to subject hedge funds to extensive Federal Re
- 2748096-028 : The SIFI designation regime does not reach hedge funds in practice: because the asset threshold is set high, at $50 billion or more in aggregate total consolidated assets, hedge funds are unlikely to