entity · derived
Tyranny of the majority
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying tyranny-of-the-majority. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3125822-002 : Reputation value in any decentralized reputational system can be corrupted through three channels: direct purchase of reputation, automated worthless work, and degeneration of the system into a majori
- 3125822-003 : The problems of corruption, Sybil attacks, and tyranny of the majority have plagued every previous autonomous decentralized reputation platform, so they are the design constraints any new architecture
- 3125822-015 : Tyranny of the majority is countered by a time delay in announcing upvote results, so that experts cannot see the majority position before they commit their own stake.
- 3782210-033 : One-person-one-vote governance fails on technical questions because half the members have less than average expertise yet equal power, which incentivizes experts to gain power by catering to less expe
- 5254152-014 : High governance scores require explicit mechanisms that prevent common governance failures, specifically the tyranny of the majority and the tragedy of the commons, such as reputation based voting, mu