entity · derived
Voting power
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying voting-power. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3441904-022 : Token concentration in existing decentralized protocols is extreme: on and around September 12, 2017, 4.11 percent of bitcoin addresses controlled 96.53 percent of the total bitcoin supply.
- 3799320-027 : Suboptimal voting outcomes in existing decentralized protocols trace to one token one vote mechanisms, which allocate more power to holders of a significant share of total token supply.
- 4067783-005 : Governance by fungible tokens lets whales control a fundraiser DAO, which is antithetical to decentralized governance, and selling purchasable voting power via fungible tokens creates the risk of host
- 4067783-011 : Insider rug pulls are not the only exploit path: a DAO can also be attacked from the outside whenever its governance grants voting power through fungible tokens.
- 4529715-040 : When only a minority of members, such as Audius node operators, can stake or earn weighted votes, the majority of token holders occupy the same powerless position as an ordinary shareholder in a corpo
- 4900878-026 : Tokens solve the quantification problem in quantum economics by serving as measurable units of value and governance: token denominated voting power in a DAO makes social influence and decision making