kaal:position:2026-07-31-7676

ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE IN AI MANAGEMENT presents the following source proposition: It examines how ethical principles and governance mechanisms facilitate the responsible use of AI, taking into account both legal obligations and social expectations. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Building lawyers' capacity to think about the social and ethical implications of code is both essential and inevitable, but saying anything sensible about the ethics of technology first requires understanding coding and coders. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3528.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE IN AI MANAGEMENT

kaal:claim:3227967-030
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967
Source PDF sha256: f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3528
Mapping ambiguous: true

education-and-practiceopen-source-and-codelaw-and-legal-systemsai-and-agentshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 707ace702310c29b97ae59aced875855f9f0807c49217ef228cdae0f85829943
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7676.md | sha256sum