kaal:claim:1765901-029

Expanded SEC enforcement under the Dodd-Frank provision runs a serious risk of being perceived as an encroachment on the corporate governance of foreign companies.

There is serious risk that such SEC enforcement actions would be perceived to encroach upon the corporate governance of foreign companies

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), III. The Dodd-Frank Act; 2. Was Section 929P(b) Necessary?, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• expanded extraterritorial enforcement by the SEC or DOJ

predictivesupport: arguedfailure: perceived-governance-encroachmentfamily: othergovernance-designcorporate-governancesecurities-lawcompliance

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/fc38bfbb4b2cb0d0...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-029.md | sha256sum