kaal:claim:1765901-030

Overuse of the Dodd-Frank extraterritorial enforcement provision by the SEC or the DOJ could deter foreign companies from having U.S. operations.

Source quote, verbatim

Overuse of this provision by the SEC or DOJ could deter foreign companies from having U.S. operations.

From

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), III. The Dodd-Frank Act; 2. Was Section 929P(b) Necessary?, p. 21
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Cite as

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

Holds when

frequent extraterritorial enforcement under Section 929P(b)

Classification

predictivesupport: arguedfailure: foreign-operations-deterrencefamily: othersecurities-lawcompliance

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9ab0b6988dce3cc3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-030.md | sha256sum