kaal:claim:2029983-019

The German KapMuG does not relieve trial judges of deciding the legal issues in every individual case, so it remains administratively burdensome even though its model case judgment binds the trial courts.

Source quote, verbatim

The KapMuG, how- ever, does not discharge the trial judges from addressing the legal issues in each and every case individually.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012), II.A. The Proliferation of European Collective Procedures, p. 33
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

Holds when

German model case proceedings for capital markets claims

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: kapmug-administrative-burdenfamily: supervisory-capacity-gapinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/8318c6f08bd5b267...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-019.md | sha256sum