kaal:claim:2267560-018

Private rulemakers have a comparative advantage over public rulemakers in the dynamic regulation framework because public rulemakers lack comparable access to timely and institution-specific information.

Private rulemakers in the dynamic regulation framework have a comparative advantage over public rulemakers who do not have comparable access to timely and institution-specific information.

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013), II.3 Dynamic Regulation as Piecemeal Social Engineering, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560

mechanismsupport: argueddynamic-regulationdisclosure

• restated_by kaal:claim:2831040-035 Private rulemakers hold a comparative advantage over public rulemakers because they often can produce and acce...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2740477-031 Private rulemakers hold a comparative advantage over public rulemakers because, unlike their public counterpar...
• restated_by kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-011 Private rulemakers hold a comparative informational advantage over public rulemakers because they can produce ...
• extended_by kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-033 Self reporting supplies institution specific information from which the government can identify governance sho...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7ecc9dd1826121a95bf252476cdaa1c8737ad8079e12caf66c4342ffae7af8af. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b51c5b8cfd4feacc...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-018.md | sha256sum