kaal:claim:2732915-030

A majority of respondents already took the regulatory regime into account in sizing assets under management before the Dodd-Frank Act was enacted, which implies that Dodd-Frank did not make much difference in how they run their business.

It shows that a majority of respondents did in fact take the regulatory regime into account before Dodd- Frank, implying that Dodd-Frank did not make much difference in the way respondents run their business.

Wulf A. Kaal, The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study (2016), IV. Results, 3. Assets Under Management, p. 28
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732915 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, The Private Fund Industry Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act – A Survey Study (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2732915

• responses to survey question 7.b.ii
• a significant minority of 47.1 percent did not consider the regime before enactment

empiricalsupport: arguedempirical-evidence

• contests kaal:claim:2150377-025 The regulatory regime does not drive fund sizing for most advisers: 82.02% of respondents would not take the c...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 643658c02f6625bca35595696116d0ad74d681ed8579c644832ae4a88b2a8c14. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6704f5b32cc99942...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2732915-030.md | sha256sum