kaal:claim:2808132-009

Because artificial intelligence is not recognized as a subject of law in national or international law, it has no legal personality and therefore cannot be personally liable for damages it causes.

provisions in the existing regulatory framework. However, national and international law do not (currently) recognize AI as a subject of law. Without legal personality, AI cannot be personally liable for damages.63 With autonomous AI playing an expanding role in

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• current national and international legal frameworks
• autonomous AI acting without supervision

failuresupport: arguedfailure: AI liability gapfamily: legal-personality-and-liability-gapai-and-agentslaw-and-legal-systems

• restated_by kaal:claim:2834531-002 Because neither national nor international law recognizes artificial intelligence as a subject of law, AI has ...
• restates kaal:claim:2740477-007 Artificial intelligence cannot be held personally liable for damage it causes because national and internation...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b42200a255265525...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-009.md | sha256sum