kaal:claim:2808132-019

Because rulemakers are increasingly unlikely to be able to protect the public through stable and presumptively optimal rules alone, regulatory supplements that enable anticipatory rulemaking become justified.

rulemakers will be able to effectively protect the public via stable and presumptively optimal rules. If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents, regulatory supplements facilitating anticipatory rulemaking may be justified.

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III.2 Stable and Presumptively Optimal Rules, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• exponential growth of technology and associated complexity of regulatory issues
• rulemakers unable to adequately protect constituents

conditionsupport: argueddynamic-regulation

• restates kaal:claim:2740477-018 If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents through stable and presumptively optimal rules, the...
• supports kaal:claim:2273857-043 Dynamic regulation is the antithesis of static, stable, and presumptively optimal regulation, and it is intend...
• extends kaal:claim:2267560-025 Public rulemakers rely on stable and presumptively optimal rules because they lack necessary, comparable, dece...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/def47c0eec77cfaf...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-019.md | sha256sum