kaal:claim:2992962-005

Even if every user and supporter of the blockchain and their locations were known, it would still not be possible to exercise jurisdiction in the traditional meaning of the word, because the system operates largely autonomously.

Source quote, verbatim
Because the system operates largely autonomously, even if every user and supporter of the blockchain and their location were known, it would still not be possible to exercise jurisdiction in the traditional meaning of the word.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), I. Introduction, p. 7
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: autonomy-defeats-jurisdictionfamily: jurisdictional-conflictai-and-agentslaw-and-legal-systemscompliancedecentralizationblockchain

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b7f3726cf66628c2...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-005.md | sha256sum