kaal:claim:2992962-034

Without judge expertise in the subject matter of a smart contract dispute, user confidence in effective and fair conflict resolution is undermined, which reduces confidence in crypto transactions as a whole and can undermine the evolution of the crypto economy.

Source quote, verbatim

Without judge's expertise in a given smart contract subject matter of a dispute user confidence in effective and fair conflict resolution is undermined which leads to overall less confidence in crypto transactions as a whole and can undermine the evolution of the crypto economy.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), 3. Limitations of Existing Solutions, p. 52
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

Holds when

dispute resolution systems that select judges at random from all users, such as Aragon

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: arbiter-expertise-deficitfamily: supervisory-capacity-gapeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/27c3a573dfa32fe9...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-034.md | sha256sum