kaal:claim:3441904-021

A one token one vote mechanism in existing decentralized protocols with on chain governance resembles a plutocracy, because holders of a significant share of total token supply hold more power than the rest of the members.

A one-token-one-vote voting mechanism in existing decentralized protocols with on-chain governance resembles a plutocracy.

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019), III.4 Lacking On-Chain Voting Mechanism, p. 19
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain-Based Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441904

• decentralized protocols with on chain governance as of the end of 2019

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: token-weighted-plutocracyfamily: incumbent-resistance-to-adoptiontokenomicsgovernance-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:3799320-027 Suboptimal voting outcomes in existing decentralized protocols trace to one token one vote mechanisms, which a...
• extended_by kaal:claim:3808873-039 One token one vote on chain governance produces plutocracy: it allocates more power to holders of a significan...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3652481-030 The one token one vote designs popular in the early 2020s produced suboptimal voting outcomes because they all...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e6b562527f7f19accaa35491db0a0db168b6a936755e1dca424e9f30bee7a815. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/44586076b60fbb0e...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-021.md | sha256sum