kaal:claim:3652481-001

Tying a DAO's legal existence to an existing legal and jurisdictional framework typically forces the DAO to appoint a representative in that jurisdiction, and that representative centralizes the DAO, which causes the DAO concept itself to fail.

Tying the legal existence of a DAO to any forms of existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically results in the need for a representative in the chosen legal framework and jurisdiction, which, in turn, centralizes the DAO and results in the failure of the DAO concept.

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020), I. Introduction, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481

• the chosen jurisdiction requires local legal representation

failuresupport: arguedfailure: representation-induced centralizationfamily: recentralization-driftdaolaw-and-legal-systemsdecentralization

• restated_by kaal:claim:3799320-003 Tying a DAO's legal existence to existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically requires a representat...
• restated_by kaal:claim:3799320-017 Existing legal solutions for DAOs typically require some form of legal representation in the relevant jurisdic...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6da44ebd03d28a7f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-001.md | sha256sum