kaal:claim:3652481-034

Where a DAO's internal voting mechanism is centralized and burdened with legacy voting problems, any higher degree of decentralization achieved in its external legal design will typically be cancelled out over the long run.

Source quote, verbatim

For many attempts to create legal solutions, if the internal voting mechanism of a DAO is more centralized and afflicted with existing legacy voting issues, a higher degree of decentralization in the external legal design will typically be cancelled out in the long run.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020), IV.2.f DevDAO, p. 55
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481

Holds when

the internal voting mechanism is centralized or uses legacy voting designs

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: decentralization cancellationfamily: recentralization-driftdecentralizationgovernance-designdaolaw-and-legal-systems

Related claims

restated_by kaal:claim:3799320-023 If a DAO's internal voting mechanism is more centralized and carries legacy voting problems, a higher degree o...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/8252932435dae790...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-034.md | sha256sum