kaal:claim:3799320-023

If a DAO's internal voting mechanism is more centralized and carries legacy voting problems, a higher degree of decentralization in its external legal design will typically be canceled out in the long run.

Source quote, verbatim

if the internal voting mechanism of a DAO is more centralized and afflicted with existing legacy voting issues, a higher degree of decentralization in the external legal design will typically be canceled out in the long run.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021), Concept, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320

Holds when

DAOs pairing centralized internal voting with a decentralized legal design

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedfailure: Decentralization cancellationfamily: recentralization-driftgovernance-designlaw-and-legal-systemsdecentralization

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:3652481-034 Where a DAO's internal voting mechanism is centralized and burdened with legacy voting problems, any higher de...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/943410423fffe1d3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-023.md | sha256sum