kaal:claim:3782198-032

Proof of stake carries an unresolved failure mode: if anyone devises a clever algorithm for hijacking the block producer selection process, the network would fail.

The problem is that if someone comes up with a clever algorithm for hijacking the process, then the network would fail.

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021), New tools: blockchain protocols, p. 31
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198 · source PDF

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Contemporary Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782198

• applies to proof of stake designs that select block producers pseudorandomly

failuresupport: arguedfailure: pseudorandom-selection-hijackfamily: consensus-and-protocol-attackconsensus-and-securityblockchain

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7e1378e3eed06cace6534e7792a7307d607d18bc6beb4ac45896476280728e4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9f0d21cbbff67b7b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-032.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: Comparative Review of the Blockchain Consensus Algorithm Between Proof of Stake (POS) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS)
• Qualification: Updated delegated proof of stake and Nash equilibrium : A mining pool game model for blockchain network
• Qualification: DPoSEB: Delegated Proof of Stake with Exponential Backoff Consensus Algorithm for Ethereum Blockchain
• Qualification: Post-Quantum Delegated Proof of Luck for Blockchain Consensus Algorithm