kaal:claim:3782214-027

The two sources of instability require different remedies and must not be swapped: dynamic rules are a mismatch for instability caused by the profit motive, and a reputational system is not an efficient method for attenuating instability caused by a group's diverse values.

Source quote, verbatim
Trying to institute dynamic rules to attenuate the instability due to a for-profit motive is a mismatch. Similarly instituting a reputational system is not an efficient method for attenuating the instability due to a group's diverse values.
From

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021), Reputation counters instability from profit motive, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214 · source PDF

Cite as

Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Governance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782214

Classification

failuresupport: assertedfailure: remedy mismatchfamily: otherreputationgovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is ba892bb200c1455447c0014f5067a501a93ea9ec413c31942d95952eb3bdfd9d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/8db55e5b39136bc8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782214-027.md | sha256sum