kaal:claim:4067783-014

Defending a DAO against attackers and looters, and punishing self-dealing, requires sustainable decentralized governance built on non-fungible tokens rather than tradable voting power.

Source quote, verbatim

The takeover of the Build Finance DAO highlights the need for sustainable decentralized governance solutions with non-fungible tokens to defend the DAO from attackers/looters and punish self- dealing.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022), II.2.b) External Takeovers, p. 8
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

Classification

designsupport: arguedtokenomicsgovernance-designconsensus-and-security

Related claims

restates kaal:claim:3441904-038 Optimized DAO governance should pay members only indirectly, through fungible salary tokens issued in proporti...
restates kaal:claim:3799320-028 Reputation based staking removes the corruptive elements of fungible tokens because third parties are less lik...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/da0a1d5d8af64625...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-014.md | sha256sum