kaal:claim:4529715-018

One person one vote governance carries the risk of majority tyranny, in which the majority imposes its will on minority groups, and it is unsuited to decisions requiring specialized knowledge.

Source quote, verbatim

However, one person one vote governance also has some limitations and challenges, such as the potential for majority tyranny, where the majority can impose their will on minority groups.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023), DAO Governance Standards, p. 12
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

Holds when

one person one vote model

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: majority-tyrannyfamily: governance-participation-collapsedaogovernance-design

Related claims

restated_by kaal:claim:5254152-001 One-person-one-vote in DAOs equalizes voting power across participants regardless of financial stake, but it c...
extends kaal:claim:3782210-033 One-person-one-vote governance fails on technical questions because half the members have less than average ex...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6f312a480c25356a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-018.md | sha256sum