kaal:claim:4529715-019

Quadratic voting remains open to manipulation and strategic voting, and it depends on a robust and transparent voting system to count votes accurately.

Source quote, verbatim

However, quadratic voting also has some limitations and challenges, such as the potential for manipulation or strategic voting, and the need for a robust and transparent voting system to ensure that all votes are counted accurately.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023), DAO Governance Standards, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Josh Bykowski, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAO) – A Market Meta Analysis (2023). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4529715

Holds when

quadratic voting model

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: quadratic-voting-manipulationfamily: governance-participation-collapsedaogovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 2d71961e8c449afbeaf45ca4f53de8a575d45c77d6960b767d3d1d0874f296b5. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/9a74a1b35881dd89...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-019.md | sha256sum