kaal:claim:4796714-030

Transparency and accountability cannot be assured across all participants in a federated governance model because there is no centralized control, and the author declines to advocate centralized control as the remedy; the consequences are biased or unfair AI systems, inadequate privacy protection, and unequal access to AI benefits.

In a federated model, it can be challenging to ensure transparency and accountability across all participating entities due to the lack of centralized control, which this author does not otherwise advocate.

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024), Adapting Decentralization of AI Governance to AI Models, p. 33
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714

• applies to federated models with distributed decision making authority
• the author rejects recentralization as the fix

failuresupport: arguedfailure: federated accountability gapfamily: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gapdisclosuredecentralizationgovernance-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:4941807-023 In a federated model transparency and accountability across all participating entities are hard to ensure prec...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/39a1bcaa6ef7c870...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-030.md | sha256sum