kaal:claim:5541658-027

Proposed regulatory remedies such as mandatory bias audits fail in practice because they lack clear implementation guidelines, which hinders their practical adoption.

Proposed frameworks, such as bias audits, lack clear implementation guidelines, hindering practical adoption.

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), Challenges in Regulation, p. 31
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

• proposed rather than enacted frameworks for auditing judicial AI

failuresupport: arguedfailure: implementation gap in bias auditsfamily: ai-oversight-and-alignment-gapcompliance

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5806bff2fc5ab658...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-027.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: The Critical Importance of Risk & Governance for AI Initiatives
• Extension: AI-Driven Governance Systems for Proactive Regulatory Compliance and Fraud Risk Management in Financial Service Environments
• Extension: Next-Generation RegTech: AI-Driven Cybersecurity and Data Governance for Real-Time Compliance Intelligence Author
• Qualification: AI Adoption as Technology Transfer: A Framework for Governance, Validation and Knowledge Preservation
• Extension: Governance and compliance frameworks for responsible artificial intelligence deployment
• Qualification: The Unified AI Governance Blueprint (UAGB): A Practical Model for Responsible AI Adoption in Financial Institutions
• Qualification: Corporate Governance in the Age of AI: Ethical Oversight and Accountability Frameworks