kaal:claim:6421319-022

Hallucination rates vary sharply by domain: leading frontier models achieve sub one percent rates for general knowledge queries, while rates climb to five to thirty percent for specialized domains and legal information hallucination averages 6.4 percent even for top models.

Source quote, verbatim
While leading probabilistic frontier models have achieved sub-1% hallucination rates for general knowledge queries, rates climb to 5–30% for specialized domains, and legal information hallucination rates average 6.4% even for top models.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, The Collapse of Scarcity Economics (2026), V.D. The Hallucination Objection: Residual Imperfection and the Persistence of Signaling, p. 20
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6421319 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, The Collapse of Scarcity Economics (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6421319

Holds when
Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedempirical-evidenceai-and-agentslaw-and-legal-systems

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0f4f68e56ee48bb8b2d73d3ab7fd96fa572e76c195694ffa740360704c1b172d. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5715ec37199a8ad8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6421319-022.md | sha256sum