entity · derived
Regulation
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying regulation. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2097160-005 : Market solutions and private ordering alone are unlikely to produce contingent capital designs that improve corporate governance in SIFIs, because privately negotiated sales so far have not produced g
- 2389416-010 : Because hedge funds developed under little or no regulatory supervision before the Dodd-Frank Act, the existing hedge fund performance literature largely fails to assess the implications of hedge fund
- 2811718-038 : Private fund investor due diligence may follow the evolutionary path of bank risk evaluation, which fifteen years ago operated without uniformity or applicable standards and is today heavily regulated
- 2922176-037 : Contemporary corporate governance reforms are unlikely to work as policymakers and regulators intend, because experts agree improvement is needed but disagree widely on what good corporate governance
- 2922176-039 : Regulators should nudge companies and their stakeholders toward recognizing the strategic and financial benefits of an unmediated and technology-based approach to corporate governance, rather than man
- 2939127-029 : The legal disputes already generated by sharing platforms indicate that future blockchain enabled sharing services will not be accepted quickly or without resistance from incumbents whose service or p
- 2939127-034 : Law schools should educate lawyers who add value by helping clients and society adjust to the technological environment rather than lawyers who impose unnecessary or unwise restrictions on it, since s
- 3067615-029 : The lack of a regulatory framework creates significant legal uncertainty in the ICO market, and because cryptocurrencies are censorship-resistant and arguably regulation-resistant by design, that unce
- 3227933-004 : A disconnect is emerging between traditional regulatory models and the actual form of contemporary business organizations, so understanding the new organizational forms is a precondition for developin
- 3227933-005 : The paper's central claims are that digital technologies have already disrupted centralized corporate organizations by enabling platforms, that this disruption will continue as blockchain based techno
- 3227967-001 : The deep architecture of a digital world regulates behavior in many ways, and those regulatory effects cannot be seen or understood unless one examines the nature of the underlying code and how it ope
- 3227967-029 : Cybersecurity should not be addressed by introducing more law in books; law students should instead look for technology based solutions and at minimum acquire the knowledge needed to evaluate such sol
- 3266953-002 : Adding more regulations, processes and procedures cannot restore confidence in institutions, because the traditional trust and cohesion mechanisms have already reached their limits.
- 3373393-035 : Because of the value to effort focus of work flows in the DAO structure, supervision of management and the imposition of legal duties on management are less needed, since there are fewer or no supervi
- 3406323-028 : Democratized banking is more responsive to regulation than centralized structures because ideas at the edge have greater opportunity to affect policy, unlike the existing global hierarchy in which a s
- 3409548-021 : A fund constituted purely through smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain may have no domicile, foreign or domestic, which makes jurisdiction over blockchain transactions a genuine problem for the
- 3409548-022 : Managers of funds that exist entirely in cyberspace cannot assume they are judgment proof; the practical consequence of operating across a global node network is exposure to more regulation, not less.
- 3409548-040 : Continued evolution and blockchain integration in the private investment fund industry depends on regulatory guidance, which the author identifies as essential rather than optional.
- 3782198-009 : The sharing economy requires a reframing of legacy legal regimes, because the legal frameworks regulating disrupted and adjacent industries are often incompatible with the trends the sharing economy g
- 3782198-027 : Contrary to the common engineering view that automated processes remove regulation, the purpose of smart contracts is to deliver much more fine grained regulation and more control, not less.
- 3782198-030 : The GDPR's removal remedy cannot be enforced against a public blockchain: scrubbing private information would require more than half of the network's nodes to change their entire protocol and restart
- 3782201-029 : Regulatory approaches of the early 2020s largely undermined the evolution of decentralized technology, because decentralized solutions at their core negate external control, censorship, and oversight
- 3782216-022 : The code that constitutes a decentralized exchange can create new risks to market integrity, because automation removes the human backstop in compliance, back office and settlement.
- 3782216-024 : The antiregulation fervor that follows from the anarchist and libertarian philosophy of most Web3 developers is damaging the potential for widespread adoption of decentralized peer to peer tools.
- 3782216-025 : Centralized securities bureaucracies are slow to update their regulations, so those regulations often hurt the very people they were designed to help.
- 3782216-026 : It is not possible to create a centralized regulator like the SEC for the decentralized economy, because doing so would place a supranational market under competing jurisdictions with naturally contra
- 3782216-038 : Banning is the only control a centralized nation has over a decentralized network within its borders, and such bans pose no threat to the network's existence.
- 3782217-007 : Legislation is the wrong remedy for oracle exploitation, because the existence of an arbitrage opportunity means systems will evolve around whatever rules exist in order to exploit the advantage; the
- 3808859-014 : The sharing economy outran its legal frameworks: the legal regimes governing the disrupted industries were often incompatible with the trends the sharing economy generated, forcing cities and municipa
- 3808867-022 : Regulating centralized technology conglomerates addresses only part of the problem, because even fully regulated conglomerates retain the power to set standards and norms for emerging technologies tha
- 3808873-023 : Government controlled regulation of the evolving digital asset space was perhaps the leading decentralization neutralizer of the early 2020s, as regulators sought to fit decentralized solutions into e
- 3808873-024 : Because decentralized technology at its core negates external control, censorship and oversight, regulatory approaches premised on government control undermined the technology's evolution, and without
- 3808873-027 : The regulation of government coins versus corporate coins versus people coins bifurcated the regulatory infrastructure for decentralized technologies, because government and corporate coins were able
- 4033886-011 : Cross exchange price gaps in crypto do not self correct because of frictions on the arbitrageur side: South Korean investors faced foreign exchange conversion costs and regulatory capital controls tha
- 4529715-008 : The absence of clear regulatory direction from the SEC and state governments helps explain why many DAOs take minimal action to establish regulatory compliance within their organizations.
- 4529715-017 : DAOs without effective governance structures and policies risk violating local laws and regulations, exposing themselves to legal and regulatory consequences.
- 4796714-005 : Technology has historically outpaced regulation, and the exponential trends in AI development will continue to widen the mismatch between regulation and AI development.
- 4900878-018 : Quantum based policies and regulations stall at implementation because the complexity and counterintuitive character of quantum concepts make them hard for policymakers and decision makers to apply, s
- 4900878-020 : The 2017 ICO wave democratized access to investment and spurred blockchain innovation, but the absence of regulatory oversight produced numerous fraudulent projects, which exposed the need for robust
- 4900880-025 : Whether automation actually displaces employment turns on more than technical feasibility: technology costs, labor market dynamics, economic benefits, and regulatory and social acceptance all conditio
- 4900880-040 : Decentralized finance and participatory governance models create their own problems, specifically unresolved regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations, so decentralization is not a costless sub
- 5254152-008 : DAOs still face unresolved challenges of scalability, governance, and the need for robust security measures, which constrain their adoption despite their potential.
- 5454054-004 : The GENIUS Act of 2025 is what makes merchant-issued stablecoins viable, because it supplies the enabling conditions of 1:1 reserve backing, audits, and AML compliance.
- 5541658-024 : The EU AI Act classifies AI applications used in judicial proceedings as high risk because of their potential to affect fundamental rights such as due process and non-discrimination, and therefore sub
- 5541658-026 : Regulation of legal AI faces a two sided failure: strict regimes such as the EU AI Act may stifle innovation, while lenient approaches such as the United States risk leaving biases unchecked.
- 5541658-027 : Proposed regulatory remedies such as mandatory bias audits fail in practice because they lack clear implementation guidelines, which hinders their practical adoption.
- 5541658-028 : Web3 systems offer significant improvements over conventional regulatory approaches to the challenges of governing AI in legal settings.
- 5554218-027 : Persistent differences between jurisdictions that favor a permissive, innovation driven approach and those that prioritize strict control and consumer protection can produce regulatory arbitrage or un
- 6607458-025 : Algorithmic collusion, the convergence of independently optimizing agents on jointly welfare-reducing strategies without explicit communication, is a first-order regulatory concern in markets populate