kaal:claim:2150377-027

The Form PF quarterly reporting threshold of $1.5 billion in assets under management is not a binding sizing constraint for most advisers: 80.46% would not take it into account in determining fund size, while 19.54% would.

Of those who responded, 80.46% would not take the Form PF threshold for quarterly reporting of $1.5 billion AUM into account in determining the appropriate size of AUM for the fund(s) they manage, whereas 19.54% would take it into account.

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012), D. Assets Under Management
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377

• respondents to survey Question 10
• measured shortly after the registration effective date

empiricalsupport: evidencedprivate-fundsdisclosureempirical-evidence

• extended_by kaal:claim:2739479-030 Sensitivity to the Form PF quarterly reporting threshold rose sharply: only 19 percent of 2012 respondents too...
• contested_by kaal:claim:2739479-031 Because quarterly Form PF filing costs roughly $10,000 per reporting fund, the $1.5 billion threshold that tri...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0b58bb409cac7674d78515f5374096f9a349de3bbd1983c990e0edc85a635a09. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/7fa22a894b6d3651...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2150377-027.md | sha256sum