kaal:claim:3799320-014

When fungible assets are the dominant incentive design in the governance of a DAO with identifiable actors, rational and opportunistic internal and external participants will typically attempt to corrupt that governance design for their own gain.

Source quote, verbatim
When fungible assets are used as the dominant incentive design in the governance of DAOs with identifiable actors, rational and opportunistic internal constituents and external participants will typically attempt to corrupt the governance design of the DAO for their own gain.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021), Suboptimal Incentive Design, p. 11
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Fungible governance capturefamily: plutocratic-capturetokenomicsgovernance-designregulatory-failurerisk-and-incentives

Related claims
Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/40e14f889f1165b1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-014.md | sha256sum