kaal:claim:4067783-018

DAO governance should use a two vote model that distinguishes a loosely coupled vote, where no reputation is at stake, from a tightly coupled vote, where the voter's reputation is at stake.

2. Two vote model a) loosely coupled vote (no reputation at stake), b) tightly coupled vote (reputation at stake)

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022), II.3 Myth #3: Ungovernable, p. 9
https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

designsupport: assertedreputationgovernance-design

• extends kaal:claim:3981021-026 Every CHARITYxDAO decision runs through a two vote model: a loosely coupled sentiment vote with no reputation ...
• extends kaal:claim:3931933-038 Governance decisions such as network upgrades follow a simple vote that mints no reputation, yet reputation in...
• extends kaal:claim:3949098-034 Conflicts of interest from DAOIC members participating on the public side of a deal are minimized because the ...
• extends kaal:claim:3981021-027 Because voting associates can see the sentiment vote outcomes and who staked what reputation before the bindin...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 48f1e307cdbbe28c7843f7744d0ba8cf01662f257a53f2066a7a6c7e03a5acec. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/91e8d376b394c957...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-018.md | sha256sum