entity · derived
Public rulemaking
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying public-rulemaking. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2267560-007 : The feedback effect between different public rulemakers and between private and public rulemakers reduces incomplete information, which in turn enables the rulemaker to modify the next action in the r
- 2267560-008 : Supplementing the rulemaking process with dynamic elements increases the public rulemaker's ability to adapt public rules to unknown future states, and thereby curtails public trial-and-error rulemaki
- 2267560-018 : Private rulemakers have a comparative advantage over public rulemakers in the dynamic regulation framework because public rulemakers lack comparable access to timely and institution-specific informati
- 2267560-022 : Parties subject to informal rules signal their preferences and efficient solutions to the public rulemaker, so informal rules and practices supply additional information that modifies rulemakers' acti
- 2267560-025 : Public rulemakers rely on stable and presumptively optimal rules because they lack necessary, comparable, decentralized, and institution-specific information.
- 2267560-027 : Private rulemakers can work with and utilize decentralized information continuously, which enables them to react in a timely fashion to emerging, decentralized, and institution-specific information, w
- 2267560-028 : The feedback process between public and private rulemakers increases the availability, timeliness, and quality of information available to the public rulemaker, which induces and supports a learning p
- 2267560-031 : Consumer opt-out from existing rules creates a feedback effect for the public rulemaker: when a critical mass of opt-outs signals that a different rule may be optimal, it triggers a modification of th
- 2267560-050 : The feedback effect in dynamic regulation, as part of the organizational culture of rulemaking, may allow cooperation and coordination not only among private actors but also among public rulemakers an
- kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-011 : Private rulemakers hold a comparative informational advantage over public rulemakers because they can produce and react to necessary, comparable, decentralized, and institution specific information th
- kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-012 : Interaction and exchange of emerging information between public and private rulemakers creates a feedback process that increases the availability, timeliness, and quality of information available to t