entity · derived
Decentralized information
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying decentralized-information. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2267560-012 : Rules can be adaptable only if the institutions and rulemaking processes that produce them integrate dynamic elements that generate timely, relevant, and decentralized information for rulemaking.
- 2267560-025 : Public rulemakers rely on stable and presumptively optimal rules because they lack necessary, comparable, decentralized, and institution-specific information.
- 2267560-027 : Private rulemakers can work with and utilize decentralized information continuously, which enables them to react in a timely fashion to emerging, decentralized, and institution-specific information, w
- 2267560-032 : Information exchange between agents of public rulemakers, such as regulators, will not necessarily involve decentralized information, unlike feedback effects between private and public rulemakers.
- 2273857-048 : In a dynamic framework rulemaking ceases to be a merely reactive process driven by the collective action problem, and instead increasingly uses institution specific and decentralized information that
- 2273857-054 : Financial rulemaking often relies on centralized rather than decentralized information, which is a further defect of the existing framework.
- 2273857-062 : The institution specific and decentralized information generated by deferred prosecution agreements allows regulators to better understand shortcomings in a particular market segment or industry, so t
- 2486570-029 : Department of Justice investigations of particular corporate wrongdoers generate highly relevant, decentralized, and institution specific information that is usable for rulemaking.
- kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-001 : Dynamic regulation is a supplemental regulatory tool, not a replacement for existing rulemaking: it increases the availability of relevant, institution specific, and decentralized information for rule
- kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-011 : Private rulemakers hold a comparative informational advantage over public rulemakers because they can produce and react to necessary, comparable, decentralized, and institution specific information th
- kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-030 : Entity specific rulemaking via governmental contracts rests on a higher overall level of relevant and decentralized information than ordinary rulemaking, because the regulatory action follows an entit
- 2740477-004 : Dynamic regulation is defined as the study of regulatory phenomena in relation to both preceding and succeeding events, using institution specific and decentralized information to generate feedback ef
- 2740477-031 : Private rulemakers hold a comparative advantage over public rulemakers because, unlike their public counterparts, they can produce the comparable, decentralized, and institution specific information t
- 2740477-034 : The data analysis shows that venture capitalists' finance allocation, and the implicit assessment of innovative products and businesses it embodies, generates highly relevant institution specific and
- 2808132-005 : Dynamic regulation is defined as conceptualizing regulatory phenomena in relation to both preceding and succeeding events, using institution-specific and decentralized information to generate feedback
- 2808132-031 : Unrestricted exchange of information between public and private rulemakers creates regulatory synergies that increase the availability of relevant, decentralized, and timely information for rulemaking
- 2808132-042 : Venture capitalists' finance allocation and their implicit assessment of innovative products, businesses, and initiatives generate highly relevant institution-specific and industry-specific decentrali
- 2831040-020 : Deferred prosecution agreements produce relevant, real time, decentralized, high quality information for regulation in most industries and are used as a preferred alternative to litigation by both pro
- 2831040-032 : Anticipatory rulemaking in the dynamic framework is accomplished by combining institution specific, decentralized, and timely information with feedback effects, which can occur between public and priv
- 2831040-035 : Private rulemakers hold a comparative advantage over public rulemakers because they often can produce and access necessary, comparable, decentralized, and institution specific information for rulemaki
- 2957645-009 : Increased availability of relevant, decentralized, and timely information for rulemaking is what makes anticipatory action possible, because such information facilitates rulemakers' predictions and an
- 2957645-026 : Contingent capital securities optimize information for rulemaking because, when issued and triggered, they produce highly valuable, real time, decentralized information on the financial wellbeing of a